home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT0740>
- <title>
- Dec. 13, 1993: Uncandid Canada
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Dec. 13, 1993 The Big Three:Chrysler, Ford, and GM
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- PRESS, Page 59
- Uncandid Canada
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>Coverage of a murder trial crosses the border but isn't allowed
- back
- </p>
- <p>By Jill Smolowe--Reported by Sharon E. Epperson/New York and Gavin Scott/Ottawa
- </p>
- <p> "Hear, ye! Hear, ye! Let freedom ring out for all our brothers
- and sisters to the north!" The unlikely crier, Buffalo disk
- jockey Darren McKee, stands near the Peace Bridge that links
- New York State with Ontario, bellowing excerpts from a Washington
- Post article through a bullhorn to Canadians on the far shore.
- WXYT, a Detroit AM station, provides Canadians in neighboring
- Windsor with an hour-long reading of the same article. The show,
- seditiously dubbed "Radio Free Windsor," has a loftier purpose,
- according to Michael Packer, WXYT's director of operations:
- "It's a reminder to the American side of the importance of freedom
- of the press."
- </p>
- <p> Such antics are also a reminder that Americans and Canadians
- are separated by more than a 5,527-mile border. The sniping
- is aimed at Canada's attempts to halt local dissemination of
- U.S. press reports about one of the most shocking sets of murders
- in Canadian history: the brutal torture and slaughter of two
- teenage girls allegedly by an attractive, seemingly perfect
- young couple. To ensure a fair trial for defendant Paul Teale,
- 29, who is also charged with 50 sexual assaults, a Canadian
- court has banned detailed reporting on the murder cases and
- on the earlier trial of Teale's wife Karla Homolka, 23. But
- now that information has seeped across the border via press
- accounts, fax machine and computer, the dispute is turning prickly
- as U.S. allegiance to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness"
- brushes up against Canadian fealty to "peace, order and good
- government."
- </p>
- <p> The controversy first began to simmer last July, when Ontario
- Judge Francis Kovacs banned substantive coverage of Homolka's
- trial and barred foreign journalists from his courtroom. Even
- after Homolka was sentenced to only 12 years for the barbaric
- deaths of two girls, the press could not report the obvious:
- that she had struck a plea. Canadian journalists who had attended
- the trial itched to write, as the Post eventually did, about
- how Leslie Mahaffy, 14, was hacked to bits and encased in concrete
- blocks, and Kristen French, 15, was held hostage for almost
- two weeks before her body was deposited in a dump. Yet no publication
- breached the ban.
- </p>
- <p> Then two weeks ago, the Washington Post published a detailed
- account of the two murders and disclosed that there had been
- a third victim: Homolka's sister Tammy, 14, who like the others
- wound up dead after Homolka and Teale reportedly drugged and
- sexually assaulted her. When the Buffalo News and the Detroit
- News and Free Press reprinted the Post story, Canadians streamed
- across the border to snap up thousands of copies. They took
- far fewer home. Canadian customs inspectors limited travelers
- to one copy and confiscated the rest.
- </p>
- <p> The Post story broke the reticence of other U.S. news organizations--and the war began. When the New York Times carried a story
- last week, 600 copies were turned away at the border. (This
- TIME story will not appear in Canada.) U.S. TV networks and
- affiliates also got in on the act. While Canada's cable operators
- blocked access to their 7.5 million subscribers, nothing could
- be done to prevent news reports from being beamed down to dishes
- from satellites.
- </p>
- <p> Students, meanwhile, plugged into the Internet computer network,
- punching up alt.fan.karla homolka to get the latest. Last week
- officials at three large universities shut down students' access
- to that Internet bulletin board.
- </p>
- <p> Yet the harder Canadian officials struggle to hold back the
- tide, the more ridiculous the battle seems. "People are only
- talking about Teale because of the ban," says Bob Levin, an
- American journalist who is an assistant managing editor at the
- Toronto newsweekly MacLean's. "The ban has backfired." Some
- Canadian journalists think a review of such restrictions is
- long overdue. Jim Coyle of the Ottawa Citizen says the ban is
- "based on the insulting assumption that the public is a pack
- of morons who would be irretrievably tainted should they know
- certain facts."
- </p>
- <p> But many Canadians point to differences between the two court
- systems. Brian Greenspan of the Canadian Council of Criminal
- Defense Lawyers observes that Canadian lawyers cannot vet prospective
- jurors as rigorously as U.S. attorneys, "so we tend to be more
- concerned about what people know."
- </p>
- <p> Several news organizations plan to appeal the ban on Jan. 31.
- Meanwhile, Canadians will have to wait to learn the extent of
- Teale's alleged depravities--or stay tuned to points south.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-